Skip to content
BidGenX

How it works

A connected tender workflow

BidGenX keeps the work connected as a tender moves from source documents to a reviewed deliverable.

Start free trial
A five-stage BidGenX workflow connecting tender source documents, structured requirements, an evidence-aware draft, human review and a proposal-ready output.
01 · SourceStart with the tender source

Documents and questionnaires provide the context from which the team structures its requirements.

Illustrative workflow based on verified BidGenX capabilities. Follow the source, requirement, draft and human review before proposal use. Open the full-size image.
What do you need to do?

01 · Understand the tender

What are we being asked to deliver?

Inspect a structured requirement beside its source, then decide what needs clarification.

Explore this capability
BidGenXIllustrative walkthrough
Northstar Identity AdvisoryOrion Harbour IAM RenewalOHG-IAM-2026-014
Security questionnaire§2.4
Managers must review user access every quarter.
RequirementR-014
Quarterly access reviewReview pending
Inspect the source and assumptions

Follow the original clause, the knowledge item and the proposal section. A link helps you review the basis of a response; it does not prove that the requirement is satisfied.

  1. §2.4
  2. R-014
  3. K-032
  4. §4.2

Delivery assumption: The customer supplies an agreed access inventory and nominated reviewers.

Synthetic example, not a live application or product screenshot. Your team validates the evidence and the final response.

02 · Find reliable knowledge

What supports this answer?

Bring supporting knowledge into view and check whether it applies to this requirement.

Explore this capability
BidGenXIllustrative walkthrough
Northstar Identity AdvisoryOrion Harbour IAM RenewalOHG-IAM-2026-014
Relevant knowledgeK-032
Approved knowledge

Access reviews can be configured with assigned reviewers and retained decisions. Verify the applicable product and configuration.

Version 3
  1. §2.4
  2. R-014
  3. K-032
  4. §4.2
Proposed response

We propose quarterly access reviews with named owners and retained review evidence. Confirm the scope and responsibilities before submission.

Inspect the source and assumptions

Follow the original clause, the knowledge item and the proposal section. A link helps you review the basis of a response; it does not prove that the requirement is satisfied.

  1. §2.4
  2. R-014
  3. K-032
  4. §4.2

Delivery assumption: The customer supplies an agreed access inventory and nominated reviewers.

Synthetic example, not a live application or product screenshot. Your team validates the evidence and the final response.

03 · Coordinate the team

Who needs to act next?

Connect assigned work and reviewer context to the response the team is working on.

Explore this capability
BidGenXIllustrative walkthrough
Northstar Identity AdvisoryOrion Harbour IAM RenewalOHG-IAM-2026-014
Assigned workR-014
Quarterly access review
  1. Response ownerResponse owner
  2. ReviewerAssigned reviewer
    Review pending
AI-assisted compliance assessmentPartially supported
Evidence statusNeeds evidence

An AI assessment is not a verified compliance decision. Human verification is required.

Review is still required. No approval is implied by this demonstration.
Inspect the source and assumptions

Follow the original clause, the knowledge item and the proposal section. A link helps you review the basis of a response; it does not prove that the requirement is satisfied.

  1. §2.4
  2. R-014
  3. K-032
  4. §4.2

Delivery assumption: The customer supplies an agreed access inventory and nominated reviewers.

Synthetic example, not a live application or product screenshot. Your team validates the evidence and the final response.

04 · Plan the delivery

Can we deliver what we propose?

Review effort, costs and assumptions beside the solution approach.

Explore this capability
BidGenXIllustrative walkthrough
Northstar Identity AdvisoryOrion Harbour IAM RenewalOHG-IAM-2026-014
  1. Access inventory
  2. Review workflow
  3. Review evidence
Illustrative delivery plan
PlanDaysCost
Discovery2CHF 2’400
Configuration3CHF 3’600
Validation1CHF 1’200
Example total6CHF 7’200

Assumed day rate: CHF 1’200. Example effort only, not a quote or measured saving.

Inspect the source and assumptions

Follow the original clause, the knowledge item and the proposal section. A link helps you review the basis of a response; it does not prove that the requirement is satisfied.

  1. §2.4
  2. R-014
  3. K-032
  4. §4.2

Delivery assumption: The customer supplies an agreed access inventory and nominated reviewers.

Synthetic example, not a live application or product screenshot. Your team validates the evidence and the final response.

05 · Build the proposal

Where is this requirement addressed?

Bring sections, mapped requirements and review context together before export.

Explore this capability
BidGenXIllustrative walkthrough
Northstar Identity AdvisoryOrion Harbour IAM RenewalOHG-IAM-2026-014
§4.2 · Proposed responseAccess review approach

We propose quarterly access reviews with named owners and retained review evidence. Confirm the scope and responsibilities before submission.

Linked requirementR-014
Review pending
Requirements linked
10/10
Sections drafted
4/4
Independent review
Pending
Inspect the source and assumptions

Follow the original clause, the knowledge item and the proposal section. A link helps you review the basis of a response; it does not prove that the requirement is satisfied.

  1. §2.4
  2. R-014
  3. K-032
  4. §4.2

Delivery assumption: The customer supplies an agreed access inventory and nominated reviewers.

Synthetic example, not a live application or product screenshot. Your team validates the evidence and the final response.

06 · Reuse the context

What can we carry into the next bid?

Retain relevant knowledge and outcomes so future work starts with context.

Explore this capability
BidGenXIllustrative walkthrough
Northstar Identity AdvisoryOrion Harbour IAM RenewalOHG-IAM-2026-014

Example records

Requirement
1
Draft section
1
Approved responses
0
  1. Requirement R-014
  2. Linked knowledge K-032
  3. Proposal section 4.2Review pending

Counts describe only this synthetic example, not live customer activity.

Inspect the source and assumptions

Follow the original clause, the knowledge item and the proposal section. A link helps you review the basis of a response; it does not prove that the requirement is satisfied.

  1. §2.4
  2. R-014
  3. K-032
  4. §4.2

Delivery assumption: The customer supplies an agreed access inventory and nominated reviewers.

Synthetic example, not a live application or product screenshot. Your team validates the evidence and the final response.

  1. 01

    Understand the tender

    Import source documents, extract requirements and keep source references visible.

    Tender Intelligence

    A clearer starting point for scope, gaps and bid decisions.

    Understand the tender before the team starts writing

  2. 02

    Prepare the response

    Assess fit, use controlled knowledge, draft responses, estimate effort and shape the solution.

    Knowledge & Capabilities

    Less rewriting and fewer unsupported claims.

    Ground responses in knowledge your organization controls

    Response Collaboration

    The team can see what needs work, who owns it and what has been reviewed.

    Move each response from draft to accountable review

    Estimation & Solution Design

    A delivery model that reviewers can inspect and challenge.

    Keep delivery planning beside the technical response

  3. 03

    Review and deliver

    Coordinate owners and reviewers, assemble proposal content and control what is approved for export.

    Proposal Builder

    One governed document-building process from workspace content to reviewed proposal.

    Build the complete proposal, not only individual answers

  4. 04

    Reuse the knowledge

    Retain approved knowledge, outcomes and historical context so the next bid starts with evidence.

    Reporting & Bid Intelligence

    Management visibility without losing the evidence behind the numbers.

    See progress now and reuse context from completed bids

Product

The full response lifecycle, organized around the work

Explore the major product areas without losing the connection between requirements, knowledge, delivery planning and proposal governance.

Explore all product capabilities