01Find an answer you can defend
When work is spread across files
Search past documents and ask the same experts again.
In a connected BidGenX workspace
Bring relevant knowledge and source context beside the requirement.
For identity and access management teams
Your IAM tender. One organised journey.From first requirement to reviewed proposal.
Keep tender documents, answers, costs and approvals in one place. With AI configured, find requirements, reuse relevant answers and improve drafts. Your team checks the evidence and approves the proposal.
Seven days. Self-service. No payment details required.
Follow one exampleSecurity questionnairePDF · §2.4
Relevant knowledgeK-032
Response owner + Assigned reviewer?
Illustrative delivery planSheet 7
The hard part is not typing the answer.It is finding the evidence, agreeing the solution and getting the right people to review it.
Source-linked requirementsAssigned owners and reviewersReusable approved knowledgeReviewed proposal exports
Inside BidGenX
See the workspace behind your next proposal.
See how your team turns tender documents into answers, delivery plans and a reviewed proposal.
Stop searching old bids for the same answer.
AI-assisted knowledge matching surfaces a relevant earlier answer beside the requirement. Check its version and review date, inspect the source, then adapt it for this tender instead of starting from a blank page.
Actual product screens · Fictional demo data · English interface
Illustrative planning figures, not a quotation. Drafts and estimates require human review. AI scores are indicative feedback, not verified accuracy, compliance or approval. Demo usage counts are not customer adoption figures.
Customer proof
Teams using BidGenX
How our clients bring teams, evidence and proposal reviews together.
BidGenX brings our tender documents, responsibilities and proposal reviews into one workspace, helping our team spend less time coordinating and more time developing the right response.
Connecting requirements, architecture and supporting evidence makes technical reviews easier. AI-assisted drafting gives our specialists a starting point while keeping validation and approval with our team.
Recognize the problem?
The hard part is not typing the answer.
It is finding the evidence, agreeing the solution and getting the right people to review it.
02Connect the solution and its cost
When work is spread across files
Reconcile responses, estimates and diagrams in separate files.
In a connected BidGenX workspace
Develop response content, delivery assumptions and solution design in the same workspace.
03Move the bid through review
When work is spread across files
Chase owners, comments and the latest version through messages.
In a connected BidGenX workspace
Use assignments, revisions and review controls to organize the next action.
Follow the work
One requirement. See the whole story.
Choose a stage to see how a source clause connects to approved knowledge, evidence checks, delivery planning and proposal review.
BidGenX
R-014Quarterly access review01 · Start with the source
Know what is being asked.
Inspect the requirement beside the original clause. Resolve ambiguity before the team commits to an answer.
Explore tender intelligenceStart with the source
R-014Security questionnaire · §2.4
Managers must review user access every quarter.
R-014Quarterly access review
Needs human reviewThe source stays connected to the deliverable.
02 · Bring the evidence
Give the draft a basis.
Bring relevant capability knowledge into the response. A match helps the reviewer investigate; it does not prove compliance.
Explore knowledge and evidenceBring the evidence
R-014Relevant knowledge
K-032Access reviews can be configured with assigned reviewers and retained decisions. Verify the applicable product and configuration.
K-032R-014Proposed response
We propose quarterly access reviews with named owners and retained review evidence. Confirm the scope and responsibilities before submission.
03 · Check evidence and gaps
Treat AI output as an assessment.
Inspect the suggested status, supporting evidence and unresolved gaps. A reviewer decides what is acceptable and what still needs proof.
Explore response collaborationCheck evidence and gaps
R-014AI-assisted compliance assessmentPartially supported
- Evidence status
- Needs evidence
- Open gap
- Reviewer decision and retained evidence are not yet confirmed for this scope.
- Suggested next step
- Confirm the review owner, evidence retention and applicable configuration.
An AI assessment is not a verified compliance decision. Human verification is required.
04 · Shape the delivery
Connect the answer to the work.
Review the solution, effort and assumptions together. Make dependencies visible before the proposal is finalized.
Explore estimation and designShape the delivery
R-014Access inventory→
Review workflow→
Review evidence
| Plan | Days | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery | 2 | CHF 2’400 |
| Configuration | 3 | CHF 3’600 |
| Validation | 1 | CHF 1’200 |
| Example total | 6 | CHF 7’200 |
Assumed day rate: CHF 1’200. Example effort only, not a quote or measured saving.
Delivery assumption
The customer supplies an agreed access inventory and nominated reviewers.
05 · Build the proposal
Keep the final decision human.
Bring the response into a proposal section with its requirement context. Review the wording, scope and evidence before export.
Explore the proposal builderBuild the proposal
R-014§4.2 · Access review approach
We propose quarterly access reviews with named owners and retained review evidence. Confirm the scope and responsibilities before submission.
Linked requirement
R-014Response owner→Assigned reviewer
Requirements linked10/10 · Ready
Sections drafted4/4 · Ready
Independent reviewPending
A mapped requirement is not proof of satisfaction. The draft is not approved automatically.
Interactive example with synthetic data. Not a live application or product screenshot.
A team workflow, not another email thread
Everyone knows their part. Every answer keeps its context.
Follow one tender across bid management, architecture, commercial review and approval. Select a role to see the handoff.
Bid managerExplore response collaboration
Turn the request into a work plan
Assign the access-review requirement to the IAM architect and nominate a reviewer.
Less chasing for updates. Ownership, deadlines and open work are visible in the workspace.
IAM / R-014R-014 · Quarterly access reviews
Owner · IAM architect
Next · Draft with supporting evidence
Next handoffIAM architect
Illustrative workflow with synthetic content. These are not live application records.
Where your time goes back to the bid
Spend less time assembling. More time deciding.
Use your own effort estimates to explore the opportunity. Include evidence checks and human review in both totals.
Less manual sorting
Extract requirements from source files, then verify them with their references instead of building a matrix entirely by hand.
Less repeat drafting
Find approved knowledge and previous answers, then adapt them to the actual requirement and product scope.
Less coordination overhead
Use owners, comments, work queues and revision history to keep review work attached to the answer.
Less final assembly
Bring responses, estimates and diagrams into proposal sections, then review and export the deliverable.
Where your time goes back to the bid
Potential hours saved per tender12hours
Potential team hours saved per month24hours
Calculation: (current hours − expected hours) × tenders per month. Team hours are effort, not elapsed delivery time.
Planning example only. Starting values are illustrative assumptions, not measured customer results or a savings promise. Actual effort depends on source quality, scope, setup and review.
AI on your terms
Use the AI your organization approves.
Connect a supported cloud provider, Microsoft AI deployment, or compatible private endpoint. Then control prompts, runtime defaults and safeguards for each enabled AI feature.
- Bring your approved model
- Shape each AI feature
- Keep people and evidence in control
AI
ConnectBring your approved model
ConfiguredProviderApproved cloud or private endpoint✓
ModelSelected by your administrator✓
Select the provider, endpoint and model for the tenant, test the connection, and keep credentials server-side.
Provider compatibility, document processing and semantic search depend on the selected model and configuration. AI output remains a draft until a person reviews it.
The work behind the proposal
More than a place to draft answers.
Explore the capabilities around each answer, from the first requirement to the knowledge you reuse.
Understand the tender
Requirements, source references, coverage and bid qualification.
Find the evidence
Capability, product and approved response knowledge.
Move the team forward
Owners, comments, work queues and response reviews.
Plan the solution
Effort, assumptions, costs and solution diagrams.
Build the proposal
Sections, mapped requirements, revisions and supported exports.
Learn from the work
Progress, outcomes and relevant historical context.
The full IAM tender toolkit
From the first file to the next opportunity.
Explore the tools and benefits for IGA, access management, SSO, MFA, PAM and CIAM tenders.
Intake & bid decisionsUnderstand the request and focus effort on the right opportunity.
What is included
- PDF, DOCX, XLSX, PPTX, CSV, TXT and Markdown intake
- Extraction profiles, source references and overlap review
- Qualification, go/no-go criteria and preparation capacity
Knowledge & product fitReuse the right evidence instead of relying on an old answer.
What is included
- Approved knowledge, history, provenance and review schedules
- Product/version catalogue, discovery and capability comparison
- Requirement fit, evidence gaps and configured semantic search
Responses & team reviewKeep specialists working with shared context and clear ownership.
What is included
- Manual and AI-assisted answers with source context
- Owners, reviewers, comments, revisions and work queues
- Human approval and recovery of saved drafts
Architecture & commercialsExplain both the proposed solution and the work behind its price.
What is included
- Editable solution diagrams and proposal figures
- Phase effort, role rates, scenarios and additional costs
- Risks, contingency, assumptions and exclusions
Proposals & questionnairesAssemble the bid in a structured, reviewable deliverable.
What is included
- Four proposal templates, flexible outlines and section generation
- Mapped responses, figures, revisions and independent review
- DOCX, PDF and HTML exports; spreadsheet questionnaire round trip
Progress & lessons learnedSee the next action and carry useful learning into future bids.
What is included
- Dashboards, deadline views and report snapshots
- Win/loss outcomes, retrospectives and knowledge reuse analytics
- Historical comparisons and bid intelligence
AI & communicationsFit assistance and reminders to your organisation’s configuration.
What is included
- Supported cloud AI, Microsoft AI and compatible private endpoints
- Feature prompts, guardrails, usage and error monitoring
- In-app notifications; configured SMTP or Resend email
Access & administrationOrganise teams, permissions and review responsibilities centrally.
What is included
- Tenant administration, invitations, roles and seat management
- MFA, SAML/OIDC configuration, session policies and audit logs
- Branding and English, German, French and Italian interfaces
Your team. Your environment.
Plan the right deployment model.
SaaS and On-Prem delivery are in scope. Availability depends on release qualification and the infrastructure, identity, recovery and operational requirements agreed for your environment.
Explore enterprise controlsSame product. Choose your seats.
Business and Professional include the same core platform and customer-managed provider connections. BidGenX-managed AI and notifications are optional paid services.
Business
CHF700
per month
Included seats5 seats
Professional
CHF1’299
per month
Included seats15 seats
Prices in CHF, excluding applicable taxes. Need more than 15 seats? Let us discuss your team.
A few things worth knowing.
What should we check in the trial?
Use representative tender material. Inspect extracted requirements, source references and response drafts, then evaluate the review and proposal workflow against your own needs.
Can we bring our own knowledge?
Use your capability, product and response knowledge as context. Your team remains responsible for keeping it accurate, current and suitable for reuse.
Can we use our own AI provider or private model?
AI Management supports configured cloud providers, Microsoft AI deployments and compatible private or self-hosted endpoints. An administrator selects and tests the endpoint and model. Compatibility varies by provider, model and feature, and semantic knowledge search has separate configuration requirements.
What happens when we need guided help?
The trial is self-service. Guided demos, tender workshops and hands-on consultation are paid services. Scope and price are agreed before scheduling.
See how it fits your next tender.
Explore the product yourself. Bring your team into the evaluation, not just the final review.